🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial policy to restrict social platforms access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

European Trend

In Europe, a rising chorus of countries are considering similar bans.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our kids' youth". The policy may be formalized next year.
• Norway is set to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media account holders. Authorities have indicated that an similar ban is "an measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to pass a bill increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a related move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised families to restrict their children from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a advisory statement demanding a ban for minors except if guardian approval is given. Even though it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the step does not create binding law.

"A clear age limit is a solid starting point," stated the European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any action must be "based on conclusive data".

Last year, momentum grew behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately weakened. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. One foundation founded by the family of a girl who died after encountering disturbing social media material suggests that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to build products and services that are safe and suitable for young users," said a prominent peer.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, legislation is mostly unfolding at the local government level amid country-wide stalemate.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure banning those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further use dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced bills requiring adult authorization for under-16s to create social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from various figures to copy Australia's path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Apart from the West, additional states are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, world agencies adopt a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions have downsides and "might backfire". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this global debate continues, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries show that policymakers globally are less and less willing to delay for the industry to self-regulate.